SportLogia
          Vol. 7, Issue 2, Decembar 2011.
          
SOME DIFFERENCES IN SPORTS MOTIVATION OF YOUNG FOOTBALL PLAYERS FROM RUSSIA, SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
Marijana  Mladenović1 and Aleksandar Marjanović2
            1College of Sports & Health, Belgrade, Serbia
              2College of Sports & Health, Belgrade, Serbia
   Krasnodar Football Academy,  Krasnodar, Russia
          
ORGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER
            10.5550/sgia.110702.en.145M
            COBISS.BH-ID: 2432792  
            UDC: 796.332.012-053.2
Summary
FULL TEXT (.pdf) free of charge
 LONG SUMMARY(.pdf)
In accordance with the conceptual framework of self-determination theory, sports motivation in this research was operationalized as intrinsic motivation (to know, to accomplish and to experience stimulation), extrinsic motivation (by identification, introjection and external regulation) and amotivation for sport (Deci & Ryan, 2000). The aim of this exploratory research was to test such concept of sports motivation on a sample of young football players from different countries (Russia, Serbia, and Montenegro). It was assumed that young football players did not differ with respect to intrinsic motivation regardless of their age and country. Major differences were assumed to exist in extrinsic aspects of sports motivation which may indicate a potential specificity of social influences in various countries or different development-related levels of internalization of extrinsic reasons for engaging in sports activity. The research included 178 young football players aged 12 to 15. The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS-28; Pelleiter, Fortier, Vallerand, Briere, Tuson, & Blais, 1995) was used. t-test, ANOVA and MANOVA were applied. Significant differences were found between young football players from Russia and from Serbia and Montenegro regarding intrinsic motivation to accomplish and all aspects of extrinsic motivation. The twelve-year-olds differ from other tested ages by amotivation, and there are important differences between the football players aged 13 and 14 regarding extrinsic motivation by identification, introjected extrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation by external regulation. When the country and age of young football players are taken into account at the same time by the motivation analysis, the major difference is spotted only in introjected extrinsic motivation.
Key words: sports motivation, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, football.
References:
Chirkov, V. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2001).  Parent and Teacher Autonomy Support in Russian and U.S. Adolescents. Journal  of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 618-635. 
            doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005006     ![]()
            Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., & Wellness, C. (2005). Cultural Context and  Psychological Needs in Canada and Brasil: Testing a Self-Determination Approach  to Internalization of Cultural Practices, Identity and Well-Being. Journal  of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 423-443. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275960    ![]()
            Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits:  Human Needs and the Self Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI110401     ![]()
            Lazarević, Lj. (2001). Psihološke osnove fizičke kulture [Psychological  foundations of physical education]. Belgrade, Serbia: College of Sports  Coaching.
            Marjanović, А. (2010). ?????? ???????Теория футбола [Theory of  football]. Krasnodar, Russia: Krasnodar Football Academy.
            McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human Motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge  University Press.
            Mladenović, M. (2010a). Samomotivacija [Self-motivation]. Belgrade,  Serbia: Foundation Andrejević.
            Mladenovic, M. (2010b). The Structure of Sports Motivation and the Perception  of a Coach’s Approach to Athletes. Sport – Science and Practice, 1(2),  131-143.
            Mladenovic, M. (2010c). The Link of a Coach’s Perception of Locus of Control  and His/Her Motivational Approach to Athletes. Sportlogia, 6(2),  35-42. 
            doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5550/sgia.s1002029   ![]()
            Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Brière, N.  M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation,  extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale  (SMS). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 17, 35-53. 
            Pelletier, L. G., Vallerand, R. J. & Sarrazin, P. (2007). The Revisited  Six-factor Sport Motivation Scale (Mallett, Kawabata, Newcombe, Otero-Forero,  & Jackson, 2007): Something old, something new and something borrowed. Psychology  of Sport and Exercise, 8, 615-621.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.03.006   ![]()
            Vansteenkiste, M. & Deci, E. L. (2003). Competitively Contigent Rewards and  Intrinsic Motivation: Can Losers Remain Motivated? Motivation and Emotion, 27(4), 273-299. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026259005264    ![]()
          Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The Development of  the Five Mini-theories of Self-Determination Theory: An Historical Overview,  Emerging Trends and Future Directions. In T. C. Urdan,  & S.  Karabenick, (Eds). The Decade Ahead: Theoretical Perspectives on Motivation  and Achievement, Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 16(A), 105-165




