SportLogia
          Vol. 10, Issue 1, June 2014.
      
CONTENTS AND THE ESSENCE OF THE EDUCATIONAL KINESIOLOGY
        Vladimir Irhin1,  Irina Irhina2, Olga Pol’schikova1, and Alexander Markov3
         
        1Faculty of Physical Culture, Belgorod State National  Research University ″BelSU″, 
Russian Federation
2Department of Pedagogy Russian Federation, Belgorod  State National Research 
University ″BelSU″, Russian Federation
3Faculty of Romance and Germanic Philology, Belgorod  State National Research 
University ″BelSU″, Russian Federation      
        Original SCIENTIFIC PAPER
        doi: 10.5550/sgia.141001.en.003I
        UDC: 796.012:612.766
Summary
FULL TEXT (.pdf)
        This work is devoted to the content and nature of  educational kinesiology, it differs from the physical culture, sport and  applied kinesiology. The study of the ancient thinkers of the relationship of  human movement and its development scientists to the middle of XX century to  the conclusion: the skillful use of this interdependence and contributes to the  effectiveness of training and development of the whole person. In 60-th years  of XX century Gudchard introduced into scientific use the concept ”applied kinesiology”,  the subject of the research was the impact of motor actions on the  physiological systems of the human body. Development in the second half of the  XX century, biomechanics and psychology predetermined the emergence of sports  kinesiology, studying the peculiarities of the techniques outstanding athletes.  In the 70-80s of XX century began to develop educational kinesiology, based on  the connection of the motor plastics and thinking process, education through  the movement. Tools of educational kinesiology (speech movement, pantomime  encoded speech and other) differ from the means of physical culture in their  goals, direction, content, methods and results. When using kinesiological funds  crossed the middle line of the body, several movements in a clear sequence with  repetition and speed, or the motion is transmitted creative thinking and  meaning of the speech. Currently ripe theoretical and practical prerequisites  for the development of precise approach in education as a methodological basis  of motor pedagogy.
        Key words: applied kinesiology, content and essence, educational  kinesiology, history of development, sports kinesiology, tools of educational  kinesiology.
        References
        Anokhin,  P.K. (1973).  Fundamental questions of the general theory of functional systems.  Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
Bazarny, V.F.(1995).  Methodologies and techniques emancipation neurophysiological foundations of  mental and physical development of students in the structures of the  educational process. Sergiev Posad.
Balsevich,  V.K.  (2000). Ontokineziologiya rights. Moscow, Russia: Theory and Practice of  Physical Culture.
Bernstein,  N.A. (1947). On the construction of  movements. Moscow, Russia: Honey. guise.
Glukhova,  T. P. (2003). Efficacy motivational program-oriented software  kinesiologicheskih methods of foreign language teaching. Unpblish doctoral  dissertation. Barnaul State Pedagogical University.
Gross,  H. G. (1976). Educational Kinesiology - one of the trends in sports training  and biomechanics. Теория и практика физ.  культуры, 11, 9-13.
Goodhart,  D. (2005). Dural theory and muscle functional circuits. ЛФК и массаж., 9, 51-54.
Dennison,  P., & Dennison, G. (1998). Gymnastics brain. Orekhovo-Zuyevo, Russia: Private  educational institution psychological assistance "Ascent".
Irhin,  V. N. (2013). Development of ideas in educational kinesiology pedagogical  theory and practice. Bulletin of the  Vladimir State University. 12, 53-62.
History  education and pedagogical thought: Textbook. (2003). For stud. vyssh. Textbook.  institutions. Moscow, Rissia: Publishing house - Press.
Galen,  C. (1999). On the appointment of the  human body. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: Phoenix, 1999 - 601 p.
 Copleston, F. C. (2003). History of Philosophy: Ancient Greece and Rome. Moscow, Russia:  Tsentrpoligraf.
Korenberg,  V. B. (2005). Fundamentals of sports  kinesiology. Moscow, Russia: Sport.
Leontiev.  , A. N. (1977). Activity . Consciousness.  Personality. Moscow, Russia: Politizdat.
Luria,  A. R. (1970). Human brain and  psychological processes. Moscow, Russia: Education.
Meinberg,  E.  (1995). Main problems of pedagogy sport. Moscow, Russia: Aspect Press.
Milrud,  R. P. (1992). Developing training by  foreign language at school. Unpublish doctoral dissertation, University of  Moscow.
Pavlov,  I. P. (1951). Selected Works. Moscow Russia: Gospolitizdat.
Pestalozzi,  I. G. (1965). About physical education as  the basis of experience of building an elementary gymnastics, containing a  serial number of physical exercises. Moscow Russia: Education.
Polschikova,  O. V. (2012). Shaping the future teachers  to motivate healthy lifestyle kineziologicheskuyu means. Unpublish doctoral  dissertation. University of Belgorod.
Rousseau, J. J. (1981). Emile or on Education. Pedagogical  works in two volumes. Moscow Russia:  Education.
Sechenov,  I. M. (1995). Psychology of behavior.  Moscow Russia: Inst  practical. Psychology.
Shanina, G. E. (1997). Special  kinesiological complex system of training effects in pupils and students. Unpublish  doctoral dissertation. University of Krasnodar.
Stokes, G., &  Whiteside, D. (1987). One Brain: Dyslexic  Learning Correction and Brain Integration. Burbank, CA: Three In One  Concepts. 




